Islam: What the West Must Know is a 2006 documentary movie produced by Quixotic Media. In response to the producers, the movie is an examination of Islam and its violence in the direction of non-Muslims.
It options discussions utilizing passages from spiritual texts and consists of commentaries by Robert Spencer, Serge Trifkovic, Bat Ye’or, Abdullah Al-Araby, and Walid Shoebat.
The movie premiered on the American Movie Renaissance Pageant in Hollywood on January 15, 2006, and had a restricted theatrical launch in Chicago, Washington, D.C., and Atlanta in summer time 2006. The movie had caught consideration primarily via its distribution by way of net.

Some have thought-about the movie to be thought-provoking and necessary, with the Gwinnett Day by day Publish describing its message as “mind-blowing”. Different reviewers criticised the movie as being inaccurate, simplistic and biased and even propagandist towards Islam. The Chicago Tribune’s reviewer, Michael Phillips, describes it as a “lethal uninteresting anti-Islam propaganda piece”. The Washington Metropolis Paper’s evaluation, Louis Bayard, argues that “If [the directors] Davis and Daly had just a little creativeness, they could see that the satan they’re chasing is not Islam however fundamentalism, which assumes many varieties.”
A movie evaluation by The Charlotte Observer, which doesn’t settle for or reject the movie’s thesis, is summarized on the again cowl of the video wrapping with the phrase, “…if their central thesis is true — and it is value contemplating — then that is probably the most horrific movie of the 21st century up to now.”

Tags: Fundamentalism is the demand for a strict adherence to orthodox theological doctrines often understood as a response towards Modernist theology.[1] The time period “fundamentalism” was initially coined by its supporters to explain 5 particular basic theological beliefs of Christianity, and that developed right into a motion inside the Protestant group of the USA within the early a part of the 20th century, and that had its roots within the Fundamentalist–Modernist Controversy of that point.[2]
The time period often has a spiritual connotation indicating unwavering attachment to a set of irreducible beliefs.[3] “Fundamentalism” is usually used as a pejorative time period, notably when mixed with different epithets (as within the phrase “right-wing fundamentalists”).
Terrorism is the systematic use of violence (terror) as a way of coercion for political functions. Within the worldwide group, terrorism has no legally binding, legal regulation definition.[1][2] Widespread definitions of terrorism refer solely to these violent acts which might be meant to create worry (terror); are perpetrated for a spiritual, political, or ideological objective; and intentionally goal or disregard the security of non-combatants. Some definitions now embrace acts of illegal violence and struggle. Using comparable techniques by legal organizations for cover rackets or to implement a code of silence is often not labeled terrorism, although these similar actions could also be labeled terrorism when carried out by a politically motivated group. Utilization of the time period has additionally been criticized for its frequent undue equating with Islamism or jihadism, whereas ignoring non-Islamic organizations or people.[3][4]
The phrase “terrorism” is politically loaded and emotionally charged,[5] and this tremendously compounds the problem of offering a exact definition. Research have discovered over 100 definitions of “terrorism”.[6][7] In some instances, the identical group could also be described as “freedom fighters” by its supporters and thought of to be terrorists by its opponents.[8] The idea of terrorism could also be controversial as it’s typically utilized by state authorities (and people with entry to state help) to delegitimize political or different opponents,[9] and probably legitimize the state’s personal use of armed pressure towards opponents (such use of pressure could also be described as “terror” by opponents of the state).[9][10] On the similar time, the reverse may happen when states perpetrate or are accused of perpetrating state terrorism. The utilization of the time period has a controversial historical past, with people similar to Nelson Mandela at one level additionally branded a terrorist.